Monday, August 31, 2009

iowa heeft de quarantainecontracten klaar


voorbeeld in pdf De concentratiekampen zijn ook klaar. 800 totaal, volledig ingericht en bemand.

fear mongering WHO komt op stoom


foto: Dr. Thomas Frieden - director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
De Nederlandse media volgen nog niet.

Drie veranderingen in de berichten die door de WHO naar Reuters worden gepushed:
1. Na een korte periode van downplaying komen we nu in een fase waarin het effect van HETZELFDE virus wordt aangedikt;

2. De mate van overdraagbaarheid van HETZELFDE virus wordt zwaarder aangezet;

3. Het hoogtepunt van de pandemie wordt maanden vooruit geschoven.
Laatste bericht Reuters

Sunday, August 30, 2009

artsen weerspreken chan's bangmakerij


http://abcnews.go.com/Health/SwineFluNews/Story?id=8438883&page=2 - - persbericht WHO

vrij besteedbaar inkomen sinds 1970 gedaald




Prof. Elisabeth Warren legt uit hoe de middle class in de States wordt geëlimineerd.

Schrijver van de "Two Income Trap".

Situatie kent grote overeenkomsten met de Nederlandse. Ook hier is het feitelijke gezinsinkomen gedaald.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

makers vaccin adviseren omgeving de spuit niet te nemen



the sequence of events we're likely to see here are:
#1) Waiting on vaccine manufacturing to procure at least 150 million doses in the U.S. Probable timeframe = October.

#2) Hyping up a few local swine flu breakouts in schools in order to justify step #3. Probable timeframe = November / December.

#3) Declaring a full-blown national emergency and announcing mandatory vaccinations for everyone (to use up the vaccines that are now available). Probable timeframe = January / February / March.

#4) If the disease continues to spread, this is when you'll see forced entry into homes and buildings, forced "decontamination" sprayings, widespread arrests and forced quarantine of resisters, Martial Law and a complete crackdown on freedoms (especially in the inner cities). This will likely continue through the winter until Spring arrives, bringing the sunshine that will suppress the virus around the May 2010 timeframe.
All this is written in black ink. It's already part of the pandemic response plan. Body bags, FEMA camps and much more.

Two years ago, this was all the domain of conspiracy theory "wingnuts." Now it's State law. Now it's being openly discussed in security conferences and health care meetings. What will we do when the hospital beds are full? How will we accomplish the "involuntary transportation" of those who are infected? Are there enough zip-tie handcuffs to go around? How do we disarm and arrest citizens who refuse to be vaccinated? How do we prevent National Guard troops from becoming infected themselves?

http://www.naturalnews.com/026934_health_public_health_quarantine.html

Friday, August 28, 2009

osterhaus' corporatistische staatsmanipulatie in beeld en geluid


Deel presentatie Osterhaus: hier leren we welke bedrijven berokken zijn bij het staatsonderzoek. Zelf haalt Osterhaus de WHO nog aan.


Hier leren we dat de hulpstoffen separaat worden ingekocht en opgeslagen. Osterhaus stelt dat dit het duurste bestanddeel is van de vaccins. Voorts stelt hij dat de houdbaarheid veel langer is dan die van het antibodies.

Debat/college - Eckelenkamp en Osterhaus.

Instructief is de manipulatieve manier van communiceren van Osterhaus.

Draaien, overspoelen met gegevens, name calling en marginalisering van de ander zijn de belangrijkste pijlers onder zijn verhaal.

Wel even een kleine twee uur voor uittrekken.

Note: Ook Eckelenkamp adept van de allopathie en is voorstander van vaccineren

Note2 Over squaleen gaat het niet. Alles wordt ontleed, behalve de adjuvants

Thursday, August 27, 2009

eerste stap: verplichte vaccinatie op werkplek


With the unhappy workers, "we've had to gently remind them that there are other vaccines that they had to take to work here," Lee said.

"It's not an unusual concept," Lee added. "It's just one that has not been implemented regarding this vaccine up to this point."

Other vaccines usually are given to a person once or as a series, whereas the flu shot is given every year, Lee said.

"It's a safe vaccine," Lee said. "It's very good and effective, especially for young, healthy people."

The decision to make the seasonal flu shot mandatory comes as international concerns grow regarding swine flu, but Lee said the seasonal flu shot decision was unrelated.

charleston daily mail

swine flu vaccine song

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

meer over squaleen


The US government has contracted with at least 5 pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop and produce H1N1 vaccines, using a variety of platforms and manufacturing methods...

A novel feature of the two H1N1 vaccines being developed by companies Novartis and Glaxo-Smith Kline is the addition of squalene-containing adjuvants to boost immunogenicity and dramatically reduce the amount of viral antigen needed. This translates to much faster production of desired vaccine quantities.

Each company has its own proprietary adjuvant, acquired in each case at high cost and intended for the high-stakes business of rapidly producing vaccines for novel pandemics or biological warfare threats.

Novartis' adjuvant is named MF59, and Glaxo's is ASO3. We know they work beautifully to strengthen vaccine efficacy. But how safe are they?

That is a very difficult question to answer. Novartis claims MF-59 has been used safely by over 40 million people. However, FDA has not seen fit to approve even a single US vaccine that contains these novel adjuvants.

art. dr Meryl Nass pub. Nass

lijfspreuk prescott bush



The rules of life apply the same
To any sport you choose
It matters not how you play the game,
So long as you never lose.

sure

Monday, August 24, 2009

Wegwezen uit Massachusetts


$1000 per dag het vaccin niet genomen!

Tot 30 dagen de bak in!

O2 Dropping Faster than CO2 Rising


Liever even concentreren op het tekort aan zuurstof.

de essentie uit de swine flu conference

Sunday, August 23, 2009

laatste lro foto's apollo 14


Landing site met iets minder schaduwen deze keer. Foto opklikbaar.

NASA

Vraag: waar waren die opnames in de Kubrick Studio's voor nodig?

Saturday, August 22, 2009

stephen jones over 9/11 - nanothermite -


Op de "afspeellijst" staan 12 delen van ieder 10 min. van zijn briljante lezing. Een must see!

Friday, August 21, 2009

second wave?


WHO Western Pacific director Shin Young-soo (niet op foto): "At a certain point, there will seem to be an explosion in case numbers," Shin told a symposium of health officials and experts in Beijing. "It is certain there will be more cases and more deaths."

ctv

nooit tamiflu nemen


"Mr Castle said the 16-year-old suffered an asthma attack and was hospitalised after being given a double dose of the antiviral in May, when there was a swine flu outbreak at her school, Alleyn's in Dulwich. Tests later revealed that she did not have the virus."

UK adviseert Tamiflu zelfs tegen de WHO in.

artikel Evening Standard

michelle's slaven


Even over staatsoplichterij in de States:

Quote Michelle Obama:

“In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much,” she said. “See, that’s why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service,”

26 slaven heeft ze. Hier worden er 22 genoemd. De andere 4 zijn voor de make up, het haar etc. en Kosten: 1,7 mio per jaar. Nooit is dit eerder vertoond:

1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)
4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
5. $102,000 - Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)
10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
11. $65,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)
14. $60,000 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)
16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
18. $45,000 - Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
21. $36,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
22. $36,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)

Thursday, August 20, 2009

eerst de oude vogelgriepvaccins op - iedere huisvrouw snapt de achterliggende economie


European Medicines Agency verklaart dat het vaccin H5N1 bevat!

Concreet: Active Substance: Pandemic influenza vaccine (H5N1) (split virion, inactivated, adjuvanted) A/VietNam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14.

Het gaat hier over de vaccins van Glaxo Smith Kline.

Heb pas één onbevestigd bericht.

Denkelijk heb ben ze daar de magazijnen nog mee vol liggen.

UPDATE: het "adjuvant" is waarschijnljk squaleen, zolas ook Novartis gebruikt.

UPDATE 2: probleem is dat H5N1 gevaarlijker is dan H1N1. GSK brengt het oude vaccin onder de nieuwe merknaam: Pandemrix (EMEA page). Anticiperen ze op een nieuwe mix tussen de H5 en H1?

UPDATE 3: Inderdaad squaleen: inhoud vaccin, na mixing per dosering van 0.5 ml.:
1. Split influenza virus, inactivated, containing antigen* equivalent to: A/VietNam/1194/2004 (H5N1) like strain used (NIBRG-2. 14) 3.75 micrograms (propagated in eggs)
3 haemagglutinin (een proteine om een virus aan een rode bleodcel te binden)
4. Het vaccin "complies with the WHO recommendation and EU decision for the pandemic. AS03 adjuvant composed of squalene (10.68 milligrams), DL-α-tocopherol (11.86 milligrams) and polysorbate 80" (4.85 milligrams)

inactieve toevoegingen voor

a. het deel met het antigen:

5. Polysorbate 80
6. Octoxynol 10
7. Thiomersal
8. Sodium chloride (NaCl)
9. Disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4)
10.Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)
11.Potassium chloride (KCl)
12.Magnesium chloride (MgCl2)
13.Water for injections

en het deel met de hulpstof squaleen:

14.Sodium chloride (NaCl)
15.Disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4)
16.Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)
17.Potassium chloride (KCl)
18.Water for injections

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Friday, August 14, 2009

martial law in holland


cc IV:

Mrs Lothar, salute,

Since you are Dutch resident, it might be relevant for you to understand that martial law with power to the Dutch prime minister is not feasible until today.

However, this will change. My sources made clear that your government will pas new laws and regulations in the coming months.

Your apparachiks will have the power to put a needle in you arm eventually!

Enjoy the fight.

IV

Thursday, August 13, 2009

VI: in liechtenstein your're safe


Mrs Lothar, saluut,

Feitelijk is het heel wel mogelijk dat vaccinaties zullen worden afgedwongen. De WHO kan dit opleggen aan "memberstates".

Ik denk echter dat H1N1 voor dit najaar niet "succesvol" genoeg is. De WHO zal "mandatory jabs" politiek niet kunnen verantwoorden.

Wel verwacht ik een nieuwe pandemie in de nabije toekomst. Het doel van de WHO is immers gelegen in een giftige spuit in Uwe arm.

U kunt te zijner tijd een vlucht overwegen naar een niet WHO memberstate.

Liechtenstein is te overwegen. Birma zou ik uiteraard niet aanraden, net zo min als Zaire.

IV

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

2009: vichy teruggekeerd in frankrijk?


het nieuwe fascisme: collectieve verantwoordelijkheid. Deelt ze haar leermeester met Balkendende?

Frankrijks invloedrijke adept van dit concept: professeur Anne Laude, codirectrice de l'Institut droit et santé à l'université Paris-V-Descartes, "personne n'aurait le droit, sauf dans le cas d'une contre-indication médicale, de refuser de se soumettre à une telle vaccination. S'y soustraire à titre individuel, ce serait prendre le risque de contaminer autrui."

Kortweg "Niemand heeft het recht het vaccin te weigeren, behalve in geval van een medische indicatie" , beargumenteert ze de noodzakelijkheid de afroep van de noodtoestand in Frankrijk, september a.s.

Verschillende bronnen melden nog altijd dat dit staat te gebeuren. (burgermeister)

Mij lijkt dit onwaarschijnlijk.

De intellectuele voorwaarden zijn wel alvast geschapen.

IV

Monday, August 10, 2009

Novartis mag toch voor 700 mio aan materiaal leveren


Novartis kreeg begin juli een order van het HHS voor de levering van MF59, of squaleen, ter waarde van $343.810.470. Antigen mogen ze leveren voor een waarde van:$346.334.450.

GlaxoSmithKline ontving voor haar hulpstof ASO3 een order ter waarde van $71.400.000.

Het antigen is het eigenlijke vaccin die het lichaam aan moet zetten tot de aanmaak van antilichamen. de squaleen is de "aanjager" . Volgens Novartis kan men door de MF59 volstaan met een kleinere hoeveelheid antigen om resultaat te bereiken.

Volgens Jane Burgermeister zijn deze middelen door US en EU regulators "classified as bioweapons".

Gevaarlijk zijn ze zeker.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

RIVM = staat = vijand - kennelijk is dit nieuws


Uit NRC 30 april 2009

RIVM walst alle bezwaren altijd weg

Vertrouwen in vaccinatie niet gediend bij één instituut dat plant, uitvoert en controleert

Wie denkt dat een vaccin een ernstige bijwerking heeft, kan te rade bij het RIVM. Maar dat bewaakt zelf de veiligheid. Dat is weinig geloofwaardig, zegt Jannes Koetsier.

Als de Mexicaanse griep gevaarlijk en zeer besmettelijk blijkt te zijn, zullen we over een half jaar waarschijnlijk massaal ingeënt worden. De instantie die dit in Nederland regelt, is het Rijksinstituut voor volkgezondheid en milieu (RIVM). Ook als iemand te maken krijgt met een complicatie van het vaccin, is het RIVM de instantie die dit beoordeelt. Met het Rijksvaccinatieprogramma (RVP) gaat dit al jaren zo en dit leidt nogal eens tot onvrede bij mogelijke slachtoffers van een vaccin.

Een goed voorbeeld hiervan was Freek Hagoort, een kerngezonde, achtjarige jongen, die overleed op 9 maart 2009, drie dagen na een vaccinatiecocktail (BMR-DTP).

De ouders vermoedden een verband met de vaccinatie. Door de wijze waarop het sectierapport was opgemaakt – in overleg met het RIVM – en door de afhoudende reacties van RIVM en behandelend artsen, vertrouwden ze het niet meer. Een overhaaste mededeling op tv door Roel Coutinho (sectiedirecteur RIVM) dat de dood van Freek niet met de vaccinatie te maken kon hebben – nog voordat nader onderzoek was gedaan – deed hun vertrouwen helemaal verdwijnen. Daarom vroegen de ouders mij te helpen om antwoord op hun vragen te krijgen.

Het Rijksvaccinatieprogramma is volgens het RIVM veilig – daarover kan geen misverstand bestaan. Onderstaande tekst komt van de RIVM-website: „Het RVP is erg veilig. Het RIVM bewaakt continu de veiligheid van het RVP en de vaccinaties. Daarnaast registreert en onderzoekt het RIVM al vanaf 1962 de meldingen van mogelijke bijwerkingen. Als onafhankelijk wetenschappelijk instituut houdt het RIVM zo nauwlettend toezicht op de veiligheid van het RVP. Per jaar worden er 2,1 miljoen vaccinaties gegeven. Bij ongeveer de helft daarvan vertoont de gevaccineerde daarna kortdurend lichte verschijnselen als koorts, huilerigheid of een stijve arm. Jaarlijks worden er ongeveer 1.400 mogelijke ernstige of bijzondere bijwerkingen gemeld na RVP-vaccinaties. Blijvende schade door RVP-vaccinaties is niet aangetoond.”

Waarom is deze tekst misleidend? Laat ik vooropstellen dat mogelijke ernstige complicaties uiterst zeldzaam zijn, ik wil geen paniek zaaien. Ook ben ik niet principieel tegen vaccinaties. Maar door de dood van Freek ben ik gaan zoeken en me gaan verbazen.

Ouders van kinderen die na vaccinatie als baby ernstige stuipen kregen en nu met hersenschade door het leven gaan, weten dat de laatste zin van de RIVM-tekst („Blijvende schade door RVP-vaccinaties is niet aangetoond”) misleidend is. Ouders van de vijf tot tien kinderen per jaar (RIVM-rapportages) die enkele dagen tot weken na vaccinatie overlijden door acute infecties of zonder aanwijsbare oorzaak, geloven niet dat het een toevallige samenloop van omstandigheden zou zijn.

In de RIVM-rapporten wordt in driekwart van de gevallen wiegendood als waarschijnlijke doodsoorzaak genoemd. Het verband tussen de complicaties en vaccinatie is uiteraard nooit met zekerheid aan te tonen. Maar het tegendeel dat de vaccinatie niet de boosdoener was, is net zo min hard te maken. In veel gevallen is overigens nooit sectie gedaan, blijkt uit de RIVM-rapportages. Eerlijke voorlichting betekent mijns inziens dat artsen en RIVM niet mogen stellen – zoals nu stelselmatig gebeurt – dat het zeer waarschijnlijk is dat ernstige schade of overlijden na vaccinatie niets met deze inenting te maken heeft. In de folders die de ouders krijgen bij de vaccinatieoproep wordt geen melding gemaakt van de uiterst kleine kans op niet verklaarbare ernstige schade of overlijden na vaccinatie.

Het RIVM zegt te streven naar een hoge meldingsgraad van complicaties. Ieder zal begrijpen dat als artsen onvoldoende op de hoogte zijn van zeldzame ernstige risico’s – wat nu het geval is – dan zullen ook zaken zonder melding aan de instanties als natuurlijke toevallige dood buiten beeld blijven. Hoeveel dat er zijn, weet niemand.

Het RIVM is geen onafhankelijk instituut inzake vaccinatieschade. Als je gelooft dat de risico’s van niet-vaccineren tegen de ziektes groter zijn dan de risico’s van vaccinatie, dan is het logisch dat je streeft naar een zo hoog mogelijke vaccinatiegraad. Dit is dan ook wat het RIVM namens de overheid beoogt met het vaccinatiebeleid. Dit zet de onafhankelijkheid van het RIVM onder druk. Ernstige complicaties komen dan gezien deze rol van het RIVM slecht uit.

Bij vragen over vaccinaties leiden alle wegen naar het RIVM. Het RIVM controleert, onderzoekt, organiseert, entameert enzovoorts. Natuurlijk is het RIVM een eerbiedwaardige onafhankelijke rijksinstelling, maar in een tijd van toenemende weerstand tegen vaccinaties is dit de manier om wantrouwen te zaaien.

Ondanks de diverse rollen van het RIVM is hun oordeel in zaken van ernstige complicaties steeds doorslaggevend. Het RIVM wordt zowel door het openbaar ministerie als door de inspectie Gezondheidszorg altijd als onafhankelijk instituut een hoofdrol toebedeeld bij onderzoek naar ernstige complicaties en onverklaarbare sterfgevallen na vaccinatie. Dit leidt, zo leert de praktijk, altijd tot de conclusie dat een relatie met vaccinatie zeer onwaarschijnlijk en niet aantoonbaar is. Dat het tegendeel ook niet aantoonbaar is, wordt nooit vermeld. Zo worden ouders en artsen eenzijdig voorgelicht.

De ouders van Freek willen nu een echt onafhankelijke onderzoekscommissie. Ze vragen andere ouders van na vaccinatie overleden kinderen zich te melden via de site degezondepatient.nl.

Vermeden moet worden dat mogelijke calamiteiten met een vaccin tegen de Mexicaanse griep ook tot dit soort acties leiden van burgers die de zaak niet vertrouwen. Een nieuw vaccin is nu eenmaal niet langdurig getest. Daarom is dit een extra aanleiding om verspreiding en controle nu eens niet in één hand te laten.

Jannes Koetsier is freelance arts en auteur van ‘De gezonde patiënt’. Hij werkt mee aan het tv-programma ‘Medische missers’. Meer info over Jannes Koetsier op degezondepatient.nl.

Een kruis door H1N1- what's next?


Een enorme wending in - het lijkt wel uitsluitend - de Nederlandse communicatie. Hoe gaat dat?

Nadat donderdag bleek dat het aantal Engelse griepgevallen drastisch daalt, toch maar de waarheid, of een deel daarvan, verkondigen op vrijdag? Zo iets?

Het RIVM al te evidente sprookjes laten verkopen, doet de natie enkel verder wegdrijven bij de staat.

Het probleem moet wel reëel zijn. Anders kan de staat geen "oplossingen" aanbieden.

De vraag is dus: wat wordt het volgende "probleem"?

Die vaccins moeten immers gesleten worden. Anders wonen we straks met 15 miljard hier op Aarde!

En de natie laat de squaleenspuit van Novartis zo plaatsen. Geen probleem. Dat hebben de staat en haar meesters de afgelopen maanden geleerd.

HGR

Friday, August 7, 2009

quotes on depopulation


“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”
Theodore Roosevelt

“Malthus has been vindicated; reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village.”
Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, stated such, ironically, in 1984:

“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….” “Our program in El Salvador didn’t work. The infrastructure was not there to support it. There were just too goddamned many people…. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females….” The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….
Thomas Ferguson, State Department Office of Population Affairs

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider – Founder and Secretary, respectively, The Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, pgs 104-105, 1991

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.
Stanford Professor ” Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier

I believe that human overpopulation is the fundamental problem on Earth Today” and, “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”
Dave Foreman, Sierra Club and co founder of Earth First!

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Mikhail Gorbachev

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
Dr. Henry Kissinger New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973

Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
Dr. Henry Kissinger

“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”
Dr. Henry Kissinger

“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”
Dr. Henry Kissinger

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller

“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. “We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. “You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have to bury nine”
Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, showed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on population control

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.”
David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”
Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

“In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.”
Mark Earley in The Wrong Kind of Party Christian Post 10/27 2008

Women in the Netherlands who are deemed by the state to be unfit mothers should be sentenced to take contraception for a prescribed period of two years.”
Marjo Van Dijken (author of the bill in the Netherlands) in the Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/04/humanrights-women

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”
Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”
Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund

Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club

“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.”
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren: From a book he helped write ‘Ecoscience’

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviet Union

hattip Jane Burgermeister

een kruis door H1N1?




Het gaat niet gebeuren. Het virus blijkt slechts een verkoudheidje. De flu wordt sinds vandaag "gedownplayed" door het RIVM.

Nederland lijkt in deze stellingname en in de communicatie hierover, voorop te lopen.

Interessant... En, uitzonderlijk: niet dom...

Wat nu aangevangen met Klinks 34 mio vaccins?

Wat is de agenda?

novartis test vaccins met EN zonder hulpstof (squaleen)


foto: herr joerg reinhardt, COO novartis, voorheen verantwoordelijk voor vaccins en diagnostics
Onder een random testpopulatie van 6000 in Duitsland, UK en de VS. Ondertussen gaat de productie gewoon door.

Novartis is betrokken bij een Poolse Vogelgriep vaccin test in 2008. Daar zijn minstens 21 mensen aan gestorven. Dit vaccin tegen H5N1 is goedgekeurd door de EU.

In de VS worden squaleen en mercury als hulpstof slechts toegestaan bij noodsituaties. Een "uitbraak" van "Swine Flu" wordt beschouwd als noodsituatie.

De combinatie squaleen (Novartis en Baxter) in het eerste vaccin en levend virus in het tweede wordt door honderden medici beschouwd als zeer gevaarlijk.

Sanofi Pasteur is ook aan het testen EN produceren.

GlaxoSmithKline test NIET maar heeft wel een orderportefeulle van 291 mio vaccins.

GSK doet een "kleine test" met een van hulpstof voorzien vaccin (ik vermoed squaleen, maar krijg dit niet bevestigd) EN levert uit in Canada.

AstraZeneca test een vaccin dat via de neus wordt toegediend. Dit is een totaal ander verhaal, en voor Nederland niet relevant.

swine flu rate UK daalt drastisch


En het virus lijkt niet te muteren. BBC

Thursday, August 6, 2009

jammerlijke debiel désirée röver

Désirée Röver
Foto: Glenn Wassenbergh
Wie op zoek is naar hysterische dames, kijkt helaas best rond in anti vaccinatie kringen.

Zou ze, om dissidenten als gemankeerd weg te zetten, als debiele clown zijn ingehuurd?

UPDATE artikel Geen Stijl

UPDATE 2 Rutger Castricum op bezoek bij Désirée Röver. Feiten komen niet uit haar mond. Castricum had zijn mening al bepaald.

UPDATE 3 artikel Telegraaf. Ze raakt aan feiten, maar zorgt er knap voor als krankzinnige te worden weggezet. Over de "Khazars" en de families houdt men liever de mond in de MSM.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

de noodzakelijkheid van squaleen geduid


Herb Newborg

YourSpine

August 5, 2009The U. S. government has paid pharmaceutical companies $7.9 billion* since 2004 to develop the capacity to mass vaccine the entire U.S. population by 2011. Under the perceived threat of H1N1, these plans have been accelerated to include the use of a non FDA approved chemical adjuvant suspected of causing Gulf War Syndrome, circumventing the FDA approval process for this potentially life threatening chemical.

In 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a plan with two specific goals that relate to vaccines. The first goal was to have in place by 2011 domestic production capacity sufficient to supply vaccine to the entire U.S. population within six months of the onset of a pandemic. The second goal was to stockpile enough doses of vaccine to inoculate 20 million people as soon as possible after the onset of a pandemic.

As of September 15, 2008, HHS had yet to determine how best to build and develop the capacity to create the hundreds of millions of doses necessary for such an ambitious undertaking. Three options were identified which could possibly achieve the stated goal by 2011:

Continue to fund and expand funding for the egg-based vaccine antigen production currently utilized in the production of seasonal flu vaccine (viruses are grown in hens’ eggs). Toward this end, HHS has budgeted $600 million to offer capital subsidies to manufacturers to build egg-based production facilities in addition to $176 million already awarded.

Continue to fund and expand funding for cell-based vaccine antigen production (for example, viruses grown in the kidneys of dogs) widely used to manufacture vaccine against polio, chicken pox, measles, mumps, and rubella. To date, HHS has obligated $1.3 billion to promote the development of new cell-based influenza vaccines.

Fund next generation vaccine manufacturing, based on the use of recombinant-DNA technology. Recombinant vaccines are made by splicing antigen producing genes into the DNA of another organism (pigs, monkeys, birds, insects, etc.) The modified organisms then reproduce to provide bulk quantities of antigen. Recombinant techniques are already in use to make vaccines against hepatitis B and human papillomavirus.

All three scenarios had major drawbacks.

Using egg-based vaccine antigen to provide the quantities necessary to vaccinate all 300 million Americans with 2 doses each would require massive infrastructure build up. Despite the $176 million already awarded to manufactures, additional funds would be needed and FDA approvals (not expected until 2011) are necessary in order to even begin to approach the desired number of vaccine doses. It is estimated that the two companies awarded egg-based funding combined could produce only 125 million doses, even after the infrastructure upgrades, and not until 2011.

Using cell-based antigen to provide the quantities necessary to vaccinate all 300 million Americans with 2 doses each would also require massive infrastructure build up. A plant could produce 25 million pandemic-influenza doses at 90 micrograms per dose. It would take about nineteen plants with that capacity to produce 475 million doses. If the cost of construction, bringing the plant online, and obtaining the FDA’s approval averaged $400 million per plant, the total cost of the expanded capacity would be $7.6 billion. If each plant cost $600 million, the total would be $11.4 billion. This capacity would not be available until 2011-2012.

Next generation or recombinant-DNA is not an attractive option, as most recombinant influenza vaccines have not yet advanced past early-stage clinical trials. These vaccines could be 10 years or more away from the market. HHS has yet to fund their development for use against influenza, in part because it has chosen to build on the decades of experience in using cell culture to produce other vaccines. However, HHS plans to award contracts worth $155 million for the development of next-generation vaccines in the near future.

So where does the capacity to mass vaccinate the entire population stand after our $7.9 billion investment?

We currently have a stockpile of 22.5 million doses of the H5N1 antigen for the feared Avian flu pandemic that never materialized. The cost to maintain this stockpile for just two circulating strains of H5N1 is about $2.2 billion annually. Influenza vaccine typically expires after two years; 15 million doses have expired or will expire soon.

In addition, we have stockpiled 268 million doses of what appears to be the wildcard in the whole equation. This is what is known as an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a chemical that can be added to vaccines to reduce the amount of active ingredient (antigen) needed per dose of vaccine by “turbo-charging” the immune system response in the recipient. This could potentially stretch the supply, providing six times as many doses from the same quantity of antigen.

This would solve many, if not all of the issues regarding capacity to mass vaccinate the entire population. Instead of investing in building additional plants and hiring workers to produce antigen, the funds could be used to purchase proprietary, patented chemical adjuvants.

The only problem is: these chemicals are not FDA approved. They have not been FDA safety tested. We have no idea if they are safe and in fact have every reason to suspect that they are not.

Despite this fact, the U.S. has already purchased at least 312 million doses of two proprietary, patented adjuvants: MF59 from Novartis and ASO3 from GSK. These purchases took place despite the fact that neither chemical has been FDA approved for use in a vaccine. The manufacturers have not yet even obtained FDA approval for Phase I clinical trials in the U.S., the first step toward approval of any new drug, vaccine or adjuvant.

On average, it takes a little over a decade for a drug to move from preclinical development to the marketplace. Before a vaccine enters human testing, the developer conducts laboratory (in vitro) and laboratory animal (in vivo) testing to determine whether the product will be safe enough for researchers to proceed to clinical trials.

The developer must obtain the FDA’s approval to begin clinical trials through the submission of an investigational new drug, or IND, application. Clinical trials typically have three phases. Phase I focuses on the vaccine’s safety and generally involves fewer than 100 human subjects. The purpose of Phase II, which typically involves several hundred subjects, is to expand Phase I safety data and identify whether and at what dose the vaccine elicits a protective immune response. Phase III typically involves thousands of people and is used to document effectiveness and develop additional safety data (notably concerning the incidence and severity of side effects) required for licensing. Clinical trials generally last five to seven years. If all three phases of the clinical development are successful, the developer may submit a biologics license application, or BLA, to the FDA for review. If the FDA approves the application, the developer launches the new vaccine, a process that includes training its sales force and increasing production capabilities to meet the anticipated demand.

It appears that the U.S. is prepared to skip all of the normally required safety and efficacy procedures and allow for the massive testing of this novel adjuvant on at least 25% of the 12,000 Americans serving as paid clinical trial participants in tests of the new H1N1 vaccine, despite documented U.S. government warnings that adjuvanted vaccines can induce more pronounced side effects than ordinary vaccines, a definite downside because vaccines, unlike most other pharmaceuticals, are given to healthy people.

To date, the Food and Drug Administration has never approved an adjuvanted vaccine for influenza. Other adjuvanted vaccines currently licensed for use in the United States—against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis A, and hepatitis B—are made with aluminum. But aluminum adjuvants do not reduce the amount of antigen needed by enough to substantially increase the amount of vaccine that would be available during a pandemic.

The FDA has not approved a human vaccine containing a new type of adjuvant in many years, as all other types of adjuvants have thus far produced too many side effects to meet the FDA’s standards.

The reason introducing this chemical without the required safety and efficacy testing is so objectionable is that both of these proprietary adjuvants contain squalene.

Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time according to a 2000 article in The American Journal of Pathology.

A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis. The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.

What happens when Squalene is injected into humans?

Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.

The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.

Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system, according to award-winning investigative journalist Gary Matsumoto, who explains there is a “close match between the squalene-induced diseases in animals and those observed in humans injected with this oil: rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.”

“There are now data in more than two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers, from ten different laboratories in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia, documenting that squalene-based adjuvants can induce autoimmune diseases in animals…observed in mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits. Sweden’s Karolinska Institute has demonstrated that squalene alone can induce the animal version of rheumatoid arthritis. The Polish Academy of Sciences has shown that in animals, squalene alone can produce catastrophic injury to the nervous system and the brain. The University of Florida Medical School has shown that in animals, squalene alone can induce production of antibodies specifically associated with systemic lupus erythematosus,” writes Matsumoto.

We got our first hint at the dangers of these proprietary adjuvants when they were secretly tested on soldiers during the Gulf War.

Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines which contained squalene. MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was an unapproved ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases suffered by countless Gulf War vets according to data published in the February 2000 and August 2002 issues of Experimental and Molecular Pathology.

The Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed – as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP).

However, the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected with the vaccine containing squalene.

The Pentagon never told Congress about the more than 20,000 hospitalizations involving troops who took the anthrax vaccine from 1998 through 2000, despite repeated promises that such cases would be publicly disclosed. Instead, generals and Defense Department officials claimed that fewer than 100 people were hospitalized or became seriously ill after receiving the shot, according to an investigation by the Daily Press of Newport News.

A study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental Molecular Pathology included these stunning statistics:

… the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene.

In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.”

According to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist for the government of Australia:

“… this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called “Gulf War Syndrome,” documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War.

The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”

Clearly bypassing the FDA requirements for safety testing of these new adjuvants and the vaccines which contain them puts the entire population at risk for serious, possibly life threatening side effects, particularly any of the 12,000 trial paid trial participants (6,000 children) who are unfortunate enough to be randomized into the adjuvant containing groups.

Still, on July 23, 2009, the FDA announced, “Currently, no U.S. licensed vaccine contains the adjuvants MF-59 or ASO3. It is expected that a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine manufactured using the same process as U.S. licensed seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine but administered with MF-59 or ASO3 will be authorized for emergency use only.”

And that, “Two of the manufacturers (Novartis and GSK) have proprietary oil-in-water adjuvants (MF-59 and ASO3, respectively) which have been evaluated in a number of clinical studies including studies with influenza vaccines. These manufacturers will include an evaluation of the utility of the adjuvant for dose sparing and enhanced immunogenicity in their clinical studies. While there may be exceptions, in general, studies which include an adjuvanted arm(s) to evaluate dose sparing and enhanced immunogenicity may be conducted concurrently in the adult and pediatric age groups in order to have timely immunogenicity results to guide pediatric dose recommendations.”

The same document indicates that vaccines containing the un-approved adjuvants will be given to 100 children 6 months to 3 years old, 100 children 3 years old to 8 years, 100 individuals 18 to 64 years old and 100 individuals 65 and older in each of the multiple clinical trials. In addition, 700 individuals in each trial will be given non-adjuvanted vaccine.

Since the government has recruited 12,000 paid “volunteers” for the trials, it would be possible that as many as 10 trials could be conducted simultaneously.

Oddly, 60% of the world’s confirmed cases have occurred in people age 18 or younger, yet this age group (between 8 and 18) have been excluded from the clinical trials, with the results for this age group to be extrapolated from the other study data.

Given the fact the U.S. currently owns 268 million doses of the non-approved, non FDA tested adjuvant, the vaccines that contain this novel chemical will likely be found to be completely safe in these industry run trials. Unfortunately, the effects on the soldiers that experienced injury sometimes appeared long after the planned duration of the current trials.

*$5.6 billion in funding occurred in 2006 alone. The $5.6 billion spent for vaccine development in 2006 is 100 times the $515 million the FDA spent in 2006 for all FDA activity related to drug safety and efficacy for the entire drug industry including: pre and post approval testing, approval and regulation of over-the-counter and prescription drugs, biological therapeutics and generic drugs and personal care products such as fluoride toothpaste, antiperspirants, dandruff shampoos and sunscreens, monitor the more than 10,000 drugs on the market to be sure they continue to meet the highest standards, monitor TV, radio, and print drug ads to ensure they are truthful and balanced and provide health professionals and consumers information to use drugs appropriately and safely.

the royal scam


In a single stroke you:
a) lose the burden of external debt
b) by devaluation lose your internal debt
c) make the nation competitive as a manufacturing power.
d) scare the people back into compliance, even exultation with their low wages.
e) with the renewal of manufacturing, re-cast the power that your military rests on
f) during a time of Peak Oil, radically reduce unnecessary consumption while insuring strategic (military) supply.
g) by doing that, suck in the oil powers of Russia, Iran, and Venezuela enough to knock them off-base, first with high prices, then low prices.
h) club China into submission to the G-8 money powers again
and best of all:
i) enrich insiders beyond their wildest dreams, insuring their dominance for a generation to come.
All the right people win, all the wrong people lose.

The real magic of a good Con is not to get the money. It's to do it in such a way that the Mark thinks he knows what happened, thinks he saw the Con you're pulling, when in fact, the real Con is somewhere else. There's a saying: “Before the scam, you have the dream and they have the money; while afterwards, you have the money and they have the dream.” If you want to know the real Con, when it's all over, find out who walked away with the money. Before then, you won't know.

of two minds

klinks novartis vaccins zijn levensgevaarlijk


En de Novatis vaccins bevatten de hulpstof MF59 ofwel squaleen. update squaleen

Over andere ingrediënten later meer.

Monday, August 3, 2009

vaccines - dispelling vaccination myths with truths


Myth No. 1: Vaccines are safe

Under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System) was established. Annually, it reports about 11,000 serious vaccine reactions, including up to 200 deaths and many more permanent disabilities.

Far more alarming is the following;

-- the FDA estimates that only 1% of serious adverse reactions are reported;

-- CDC says it's 10%;

-- medical school students testified before Congress that they're told not to report these incidents;

-- according to the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), only one in 40 New York doctors reported adverse vaccine reactions or deaths;

-- international studies show vaccines cause up to 10,000 US SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths annually, and at least half of them are from vaccines;

-- another study determined that 3000 US children die annually from vaccines;

-- poor reporting in America suggests that annual adverse vaccine reactions, in fact, number from 100,000 - one million;

-- since 1988, the government's National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) paid families of affected children $1.2 billion in damages;

-- as authorized by the 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, HHS Secretary Sebelius, granted drug companies legal immunity (except for impossible to prove willful misconduct) to proliferate dangerous, untested Swine Flu vaccines globally;

-- vaccines are legally mandated in all 50 US states, though legally avoidable in most (under normal circumstances) as explained below;

-- in settling vaccine damage suits, drug companies impose gag orders to keep vital information from the public; and

-- insurers refuse to cover adverse vaccine reactions because of the high potential liability they'd face.
Truth No. 1

Vaccinations cause high numbers of severe reactions, permanent disabilities, and deaths as well as an enormous personal and public cost. Virtually none of this gets reported.

Myth No. 2: Vaccines are very effective

Medical literature documents significant numbers of vaccine failures for measles, mumps, small pox, pertussis, polio and Hib-causing bacterial meningitis and pneumonia. In 1989, Oman experienced a widespread polio outbreak six months after completing a population-wide immunization program. In Kansas (in 1986), 90% of 1300 reported pertussis cases were "adequately vaccinated," and 72% of Chicago pertussis incidents in 1993 had been as well.

Truth No. 2

Evidence shows that vaccinations are an unreliable and dangerous way to prevent illness and disease.

Myth No. 3: Low US disease rates are attributable to vaccines

From 1850 - 1940, well before mandatory vaccination programs, the British Association for the Advancement of Science reported a 90% decrease in childhood diseases due to improved sanitation and hygiene practices. By 1945, US medical authorities noted a 95% drop in deaths from the leading childhood infectious diseases (diphtheria, pertussis, scarlet fever and measles), well before mass-immunizations began.

A recent WHO report found that third world disease and mortality rates had no direct correlation with immunization programs, but closely relate to hygiene and diet standards.

Truth No. 3

No evidence links vaccines with infectious disease declines. Proper hygiene and diet practices may be far more effective.


Myth No. 4: Sound immunization theory and practice prove the effectiveness of vaccines

Although vaccines stimulate antibody production, no evidence suggests that alone assures immunity. A 1950 British Medical Council-published study found no relationship between antibody count and disease incidence. Natural immunization involves many bodily organs and systems. Artificially producing antibodies can't achieve it.

Research also shows how squalene adjuvants harm the human immune system, making it susceptible to numerous illnesses and diseases ranging from very annoying to life threatening. In addition, the "herd immunity" notion of mass-immunizations effectiveness is largely discredited. Just the opposite is true as evidence shows that fully vaccinated populations have experienced epidemics numerous times in the past.

Further, vaccine effectiveness "remains scientifically unproven" because no double blind studies have been conducted to do it. Significantly, recent disease outbreaks have affected more vaccinated children than unvaccinated ones. And the common practice of "one size fits all" is troublesome. It lets tiny new-borns get the same dosage as a five year old. It tolerates dubious quality control practices producing what's known as "Hot Lots" - ones associated with disproportionately high death and disability rates.

Shockingly, the FDA refuses to act preventatively against them. In fact, individual vaccine lots have almost never been recalled even when associated with severe adverse reactions. Instead, they're administered under the assumption that all recipients respond the same, regardless of race, ethnicity, genetic makeup, or other characteristics.

A recent New England Journal of Medicine-reported study found that a significant number of Romanian children receiving polio vaccine contracted the disease. Evidence linked antibiotic injections to it. One innoculation raised the polio risk eight-fold; two - nine shots, 27-fold, and 10 or more 182-fold.

New research may reveal other unknown hazards, but public safety won't be addressed until government health officials act responsibly, report accurately, and adequately protect their populations from vaccines they never should allow.

Truth No. 4

Many supposed vaccine truths have, in fact, been proved false.

Myth No. 5: Childhood diseases are extremely dangerous

False. Even CDC data show a 99.8% pertussis recovery rate during the 1992-94 period. One Cincinnati Children's Hospital infectious diseases expert said at the time: "The disease was very mild, no one died, and no one went to the intensive care unit."

Nearly always, childhood infectious diseases "are benign and self-limiting. They usually impart lifelong immunity, whereas vaccine-induced immunization (when achieved) is only temporary." In fact, it can increase vulnerability later on by postponing better tolerated childhood illnesses until adulthood when death rates (though still low) are far higher.

Most important is that nearly all common infectious diseases are rarely dangerous, and, in fact, can develop strong, healthy adult immune systems when they're most needed. In addition, few people know that children who didn't contract measles have a higher incidence of skin diseases, degenerative bone and cartilage ones, and tumors while ovarian cancer is higher among mumps-free adult women. The human immune system benefits from common childhood infectious diseases. Freedom from them may be harmful later on.

Truth No. 5

Childhood disease dangers are greatly exaggerated to scare parents into getting their children vaccinated with unsafe drugs.

Myth No. 6: Polio vaccinations were very successful

False again. In 1955, when the Salk vaccine was introduced, polio was considered the most serious post-war public health problem. A year later, six New England states reported sharp rises ranging from more than double in Vermont to a 642% increase in Massachusetts. Other states also were badly impacted enough for Idaho and Utah to halt immunizations due to increased incidence and death rates.

In his 1962 congressional testimony, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, Biostatistics Department head at the University of North Carolina, reported sharp polio increases from 1957 to 1959 and a Public Health Service whitewash that suppressed it. In 1985, the CDC reported that 87% of US cases between 1973 and 1983 were caused by the vaccine. Later it added that it caused nearly all imported cases, and most of the victims were fully vaccinated.

Further, misdiagnosing, poor reporting, and cover-ups suggest that the actual number of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases "may be 10 to 100 times higher than that cited by the CDC."

In 1977, even Jonas Salk admitted that mass inoculations caused most polio cases since 1961.

Truth No. 6

The Salk vaccine proved highly dangerous. Information about it was suppressed, and declines in the disease were well underway when mass-immunizations were begun. In Europe, they occurred in countries that used, then rejected the vaccine proving it was never needed in the first place. Showing also that the same is true for other diseases, including Swine Flu with the WHO and CDC admitting that most cases are mild, unthreatening, and generally pass without treatment, let alone risking dangerous unneeded vaccines.

Myth No. 7: Lack of an initial adverse reaction proves vaccines are safe

Documented long-term health problems include arthritis, chronic headaches, rashes indicative of disease, non-healing skin lesions, seizures, autism, anemia, multiple sclerosis, ALS, cancer, and many others. Ingredients common to all vaccines are at issue. Squalene adjuvants are a biological time bomb that can harm or destroy the human immune system.

Other ingredients are known toxicants and carcinogens, including thimersol (a mercury derivative), aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol, and numerous gastrointestnal toxicants like liver toxicants, cardiovascular and blood toxicants, and reproductive toxicants. "Chemical ranking systems rate many vaccine ingredients among the most hazardous substances" known, even in microscopic doses.

"Millions of children (and adults) are partaking in an enormous crude experiment, and no sincere, organized effort is being made to track the negative side effects or to determine the long-term consequences."

Dr. Bart Classen's epidemiological research found vaccines as the cause of 79% of insulin type I diabetes cases in children under 10. The sharp rise in numerous other diseases may also be linked with mass-immunizations. California's autism rate skyrocketed 1000% in the last 20 years. In the 1990s, MMR vaccine usage in Britain (for measles, mumps and rubella) occurred at the same time autism rose sharply. The January 2000 Journal of Adverse Drug Reactions reported that no adequate testing was done, so the vaccine never should have been licensed.

The Autism Society says: "Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during the first three years of life and is the result of a neurological disorder that affects the normal functioning of the brain...."

According to the CDC and National Vaccine Information Center, one in every 150 US children develop the disease. Tens of millions are affected worldwide, making it more common than pediatric cancer, incurable type 1 (juvenile-onset) diabetes and AIDS combined. In the early 1940s, prior to mass immunizations, autism was so rare that few doctors ever encountered it. Today it's a global pandemic.

Truth No. 7

Long-term vaccination reactions have been suppressed and ignored in spite of the alarming correlation between their use and the rise of autoimmune and other diseases. Vaccines aren't for protection. They're for profit and other nefarious purposes. Avoiding them is essential to protecting human health and well-being.

Myth No. 8: Vaccines are the only available disease prevention option

"Historically, homeopathy has proven many times...more effective than allopathic (conventional) medicine in the treatment and prevention of disease." During the 1849 US cholera outbreak, homeopathic hospitals documented a 3% death rate compared to 48 - 60% in conventional ones. It's as true today, and recent epidemiological studies show homeopathic remedies far superior to vaccines in preventing diseases. They're safe, effective, and toxin and side effect-free, yet most insurers won't cover them.

Truth No. 8

Alternative treatments and remedies have been safe and effective for generations, yet the medical establishment and governments attack and spurn them.

Myth No. 9: "Vaccinations are legally mandated and unavoidable..."

All states require them. However, laws vary by state, legal exemptions exist, and all states offer one or more of the following:
-- all states allow medical exemptions for persons susceptible to adverse reactions; parents can cite this for their children based on family history;

-- 48 states offer religious exemptions but may require membership in an established religious organization; "according to federal precedent, personal religious beliefs may be sufficient for a religious exemption regardless of which religious organization you belong to, or whether or not you belong to an organized religion at all;" in addition, the Supreme Court defined religion broadly for legal purposes; and

-- 17 states allow philosophical or personal exemptions.
All public and private schools must comply with federal and state vaccination laws and permit legal exemptions.

Truth No. 9

Some vaccines are mandated, but most, perhaps all, US citizens may use legal exemptions to avoid them. In a recent article, however, Phillips states:

"All non-medical exemptions in the US are ultimately provided conditionally. That is, states have the right to require immunization for everyone, legally exempt or not, during an (emergency) outbreak, other than (for) those" with medical exemptions.

Myth No. 10: Governments place public health concerns above all others

Vaccination history shows "documented instances of deceit portraying vaccines as mighty disease conquerors, when in fact vaccines have had little or no discernible impact - or have even delayed or reversed - pre-existing disease declines....Conflicts of interest are the norm in the vaccine industry." Government agencies like the FDA and CDC are stacked with corporate officials who return to high-paying industry jobs provided they place profit considerations over public health and safety.

In November 2000, concern over this and adverse reactions got the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) to pass a unanimous resolution at its 57th meeting calling for a moratorium on mandatory childhood vaccinations and for doctors to insist on "truly informed consent for (their) use...."

In October 1999, Dr. Bart Classen, founder and CEO of Classen Immunotherapies, told Congress:

"It is clear....that the government's immunization policies are driven by politics and not by science. I can give numerous examples where employees of the US Public Health Service....appear to be furthering their careers by acting as propaganda officers to support political agendas. In one case....employees of a foreign government, who were funded and working closely with the US Public Health Service, submitted false data to a major medical journal. The true data indicated the vaccine was dangerous; however, the false data" indicated no risk.

In addition, "four letters from the FDA/Public Health Service....clearly reveal(ed) that the anthrax vaccine" approved for US military personnel was done "without the manufacturer performing a single controlled clinical trial." They're essential to determine safety and effectiveness. Failure to conduct them proved devastating to the health and well-being of recipients and still does today. Besides, all vaccines are unsafe and some are extremely dangerous.

US military forces receive many or all of the following vaccinations:
-- three shots for hepatitis B;

-- two for hepatitis A;

-- annually for influenza so all military personnel will get Swine Flu shots;

-- all military personnel must have documented proof of receiving MMR vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella; those without them them get single doses;

-- two varicella (chicken pox) shots;

-- smallpox doses every ten years;

-- three for polio for adults never vaccinated; those fully vaccinated get a booster shot;

-- tetanus-diphtheria and pertussis vaccinations for personnel who haven't have them in the past 10 years;

-- tetanus every 10 years;

-- typhoid vaccinations in either oral or injectable forms;

-- a multiple dose series for anthrax;

-- yellow fever every 10 years in some cases;

-- three for rabies and later boosters;

-- tuberculosis screening and shots;

-- single pneumococcal doses;

-- meningococcal vaccinations every five years before deployment to certain regions; and

-- three Japanese encephalitis doses in some cases.
Multiple vaccinations for all US military personnel practically assures damage to their immune systems and severe health problems later on.

Truth No. 10

Public health officials approve dangerous vaccines on unsuspecting recipients and profit handsomely for their efforts.

Final Comments

All vaccines are biological weapons that weaken or destroy the human immune system. They often fail to protect against diseases they're designed to prevent and often cause them. The H1N1 vaccine is experimental, untested, toxic, extremely dangerous, and essential to avoid even if mandated.

In a December 1994 Medical Post article, Dr. Guylaine Lanctot said:

"The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination....100 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines."

Dr. Viera Scheibner is internationally known as perhaps the leading expert on adverse vaccine reactions. Her analysis concluded that "there is no evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects."

Nonetheless, immunization programs proliferate because the profit potential is enormous despite growing numbers of reputable scientific figures citing concerns.

Currently, over 200 new vaccines are being developed "for everything from birth control to (curbing) cocaine addiction." Around half of them are in clinical trials using human guinea pigs putting their health and safety on the line unwittingly.

New delivery systems are also being developed that include nasal sprays, mosquitoes, and genetically engineered fruits containing vaccine viruses. With every country in the world a potential buyer, health and safety considerations are suppressed for the sake of profits. Unless somehow this madness is stopped, the harm to our children and society will be catastrophic.

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday - Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.